2021 - 11 - 10 - t18:02:45z eprint https://repository.www.guaguababy.com/images/sitelogo.png https://repository.www.guaguababy.com/ 2019 - 07 - 25 - t12:25:10z 2019 - 07 - 30 - t11:04:27z https://repository.www.guaguababy.com/id/eprint/1050 该项目位于存储库中，URL为:https://repository.www.guaguababy.com/id/eprint/1050 2019 - 07 - 25 - t12:25:10z

随着1924年伊斯兰khilafah的垮台，许多伊斯兰学者意识到迫切需要重新安装伊斯兰khilafah。因此，伊斯兰教的政治思想在一些学者中崭露头角。因此，许多伊斯兰政治和宗教运动在穆斯林世界重新兴起，目的是在穆斯林国家建立伊斯兰统治。这些运动呈现了恢复伊斯兰统治的不同方法。然而，这是本论文的论点，这一思想是认真讨论的当代学者在两个不同的思路;现代和传统。本文旨在通过与传统思想的对比，突出现代思想的本质。为此，本研究选择了三位当代穆斯林学者:Sayyid Abul Hasan ' Ali Nadwi (1914-1999;他提出了tabigh运动的传统思想，还有两位同样提出了现代思想的学者Mawlana ' Abul A'la al-Mawdudi (1903-1979;伊斯兰大会发起人)和Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966; main figure of Ikhwan al-Muslimoon). A study of the characteristics of their thought is the main purpose of this thesis with reference to their juxtaposition and contraposition. The modern-oriented thought developed basing on the historical and geographical contexts of the Muslim world. It realised that the practice of Islam is meaningless without the socio-political system. As such, it strived to interpret Islamic concepts accordingly in support of its arguments. In contrast, the traditional-thinking scholars present Islam, primarily, as a divine message and guidance for humanity and emphasised meaningful political reform by imprinting strong faith in the heart of Muslim rulers and ruled alike, without which political endeavours are meaningless. These contrasting approaches of traditional and modern-oriented political thought in Islam are discussed in this thesis by highlighting the evidences from the Qur'an, Hadith and history. In brief, the aim of this thesis is to highlight the modern oriented strand and to analyse the contemporary Islamic thought in contrast with the thought of the traditional scholars.

M. Nafeel M Zawahir 2017 - 08 - 02 - t08:53:24z 2020 - 06 - 01 - t01:02:11z https://repository.www.guaguababy.com/id/eprint/760 该项目位于存储库中，URL为:https://repository.www.guaguababy.com/id/eprint/760 2017 - 08 - 02 - t08:53:24z

本文以哈萨克斯坦为例，评估了影响资源丰富国家建立透明制度的因素。具体来说，它利用了对关键机构的深入采访和分析，以了解这个中亚国家透明度改革的速度和强度。它认为，只有当外部透明度促进与支持改革的强大精英激励相匹配时，才能导致制度改革。在经济相对安全的2014年之前，哈萨克斯坦几乎没有什么动力去遵守西方倡导的规范。因此，政治精英经常阻碍改革的成功实施。然而，油价下跌和俄罗斯吞并克里米亚引发的经济动荡，促使哈萨克斯坦政府接受透明度准则，以吸引外国投资。

Kerem总局